new banner
about us home contact contribute blog twitter search

SFNM

LANL exploring mini-campus for Santa Fe or Bernalillo County

By Scott Wyland swyland@sfnewmexican.com
Aug 5, 2023

Los Alamos National Laboratory is exploring the possibility of creating a satellite campus in either Santa Fe or Bernalillo County for part of its growing workforce, continuing the trend of establishing offices for support staff away from the lab’s main property on Pajarito Plateau.

The proposed mini-campus, still in the conceptual stage, would relieve stress on traffic and the lab’s offices on the Hill and make it easier for employees who commute from Santa Fe and Bernalillo counties, helping the lab to retain workers, said Kelly Beierschmitt, the lab’s deputy director of operations.

An increasing number of lab employees live in northern Albuquerque and Bernalillo, partly because of the greater availability of housing and schools, so establishing a workplace closer to them would make logistical sense, Beierschmitt told the Las Alamos County Council during a recent presentation.

“It does help us with the retention challenge when people don’t have to drive an hour and a half one-way,” he said.

This mini-campus also could provide office space for Sandia National Laboratories, which is experiencing similar overcrowding as its workforce expands, Beierschmitt said.

Spokespeople at Santa Fe and Bernalillo counties said no one from the lab had approached the counties’ leaders about the idea. A specific site has yet to be chosen, and nothing will go forward until the National Nuclear Security Administration, which oversees the lab, signs off on the project.

“It’s not a certainty that we will do this,” Beierschmitt said. “We do not have any approval to do this. We’re partnering with the NNSA to explore the idea.”

if the project is approved, it would materialize in a few years on a small scale, Beierschmitt said, with about 50 people in an office.

The lab now employs roughly 17,300 people, including subcontractors, he said. LANL anticipates adding 2,000 workers as the lab moves toward its goal of making 30 plutonium warhead triggers, or pits, by 2026.

Pentagon leaders, nuclear security officials and some politicians say the pits are needed to modernize the arsenal so it will act as a stronger deterrent against Russia, China and rogue states. They also would equip at least two new warheads.

The workforce expansion is in line with the lab’s budget roughly doubling to $4.6 billion since 2018, Beierschmitt said.

“We do believe that the growth we have seen the last two to three years is unprecedented, but we don’t expect it to continue,” he said, predicting it will level out by 2027.

The lab leases about 180,000 square feet of building space off-campus, he said.

That includes two adjacent office properties, totaling 77,000 square feet, at Pacheco Street and St. Michael’s Drive near Christus St. Vincent Regional Medical Center. The lab also leases about 28,000 square feet in the downtown Firestone Building, which had housed Descartes Labs, at North Guadalupe and West Alameda streets.

All of the off-campus building space has filled up and the lab will need more to accommodate the upcoming spurt in workforce growth, Beierschmitt said.

At the Santa Fe sites, employees do administrative work, human resources, procurement, finance, information technology, communications and government relations.

Beierschmitt didn’t discuss the type of work that would be done at the proposed mini-campus, but one of his PowerPoint slides indicated it would be classified.

A longtime anti-nuclear activist said if the work is classified, the site won’t be a normal office complex but would require tight security with a fence and other safeguards.

This will make the lab’s expanding presence in the surrounding communities even more intrusive and unwelcoming, said Greg Mello, executive director of the Los Alamos Study Group.

“LANL is already too big, and it aspires to be bigger still — and that’s the core problem,” Mello said. “They need to grow up and accept cost constraints and geographic constraints.”

Beierschmitt said a large part of the beefed-up labor force now is for the massive construction work happening at the lab, much of it infrastructure upgrades to prepare for the pit mission.

When those projects are finished, the construction workers will phase out as the lab hires people for jobs related to pit production, Beierschmitt said. He estimated the tradeoff would keep the workforce at an even plateau, with no overall increases or decreases after 2026.

The heavy construction is all the more reason to reduce the number of people coming up the hill and bumping into it, he said, making satellite campuses a practical alternative.

Mello said the need for more mini-campuses springs from the lab’s pursuit of pit manufacturing. Get rid of the pits, and there’s no need for the lab to branch out into the community, he said.

“LANL is replete with missions which don’t have to be done,” Mello said, “starting with pit production.”

 


Greg Mello, published comment:

Thanks for covering this, Scott. LANL, and in several ways the surrounding communities, are really struggling to accommodate the growth LANL seeks. LANL's new pit mission is the main but not the only reason for this growth, a mission that was brought to LANL's inadequate, aging facilities and isolated site by senators Heinrich and Udall, with assistance from then-congresspersons Lujan and Grisham. They were able to enlist other nuclear hawks to speed up -- or, as it turns out, TRY to speed up -- pit production in order to provide pits for the new warhead being designed in Livermore (and at Sandia and elsewhere) for the new ICBM system the Air Force is buying. No NNSA analysis supports the LANL pit manufacturing mission. In fact in 2017, NNSA decided to NOT try to use LANL's old facilities for this purpose, triggering the Heinrich-Udall-plus others freakout that led to a plan for TWO pit factories, the other one (far larger, more modern, safer -- and later) in South Carolina, which NNSA studies did and still do support. Los Alamos (the town), Santa Fe, and other communities are increasingly paying the price for LANL taking on "the dirty work" for the suburban California lab. A mountain of money will be spent here to do this, but there won't be "economic development" from this mission, for a variety of reasons including increasing inequality, housing market distortions, and LANL sucking up so much of the talent and skills so badly needed in the real economy into LANL's "black hole," where so much goes in and nothing valuable comes out, unless you count nuclear waste. New Mexico will be poorer as a result, as is always the case when really nasty jobs go to peripheral places that accept them in the desperate hope they will bring "jobs."

Readers might like to know that in 2019 NNSA did approve the purchase, by NNSA, of the entire Midtown property from the City of Santa Fe, which thankfully did not accept the offer, largely due to public input that asked the City for a mixed-use site. Also, LANL was in negotiation with at least one landowner in Santa Fe for the creation and operation of a biological laboratory to study, among other things, pathogens. Those negotiations fell through; the landowner was told that LANL felt the Rio Rancho area would be more appropriate for that job. Whether that biolab plan is still active, or not, we don't know. Some people high in government don't like it, so that's good.

This is the fifth time LANL has attempted the pit mission. To the extent the US retains nuclear weapons, new pits would eventually be needed, on a scale determined by the scale of the arsenal among other things. But new pits aren't needed now, or in the years LANL projects being able to make them. For those who want nuclear weapons, there are enough perfectly "acceptable" modern, "safe," accurate warheads for all the new ICBMs, without making any more. (These are W87-0 warheads, with insensitive high explosives, a modern "smart" fuze that makes them super-accurate, and with fairly new pits to boot. They are also extensively flight-tested, and have decades of surveillance findings that make them extremely well-understood.) But that wouldn't give Livermore something new to do, or expand LANL to 20,000 people as is now envisioned, or drive the whole warhead complex to new heights of employment and tempo of work. And it wouldn't allow multiple warheads on the new missiles, evidently for the purpose of "scaring" Russia, or targeting both of our unnecessary "enemies" at the same time. This whole charade has gone on far too long. Once again, New Mexico is being the perfect chump, ready to accept whatever nuclear "dirt" our sold-out senators ask us to accept, no matter at what cost to our communities, identities, self-respect, and future.



^ back to top

2901 Summit Place NE Albuquerque, NM 87106, Phone: 505-265-1200